![]() ![]() All re-submitted items undergo a strict compliance review and will be re-published only if the item passes that review. *Please keep in mind that after you resubmit your item, it will not be immediately published live in the store. Please reply to this email for issues regarding this item removal. For more information on the new Chrome extensions quality policy, please refer to the FAQ: If you’d like to re-submit it, please modify the item so that it complies with the policies, then re-publish it in your developer dashboard. For example, an extension that provides a broad array of functionalities on the New Tab Page/ Start-up Page but also changes the default search are better delivered as separate extensions, so that users can select the services they want. If two pieces of functionality are clearly separate, they should be put into two different extensions, and users should have the ability to install and uninstall them separately. Do not create an extension that requires users to accept bundles of unrelated functionality, such as an email notifier and a news headline aggregator. Your item did not comply with the following section of our policy: An extension should have a single purpose that is clear to users. Your Google Chrome item, "uBlock Origin development build", with ID: cgbcahbpdhpcegmbfconppldiemgcoii did not comply with our policies and was removed from the Google Chrome Web Store. Learning about this factor will help you best understand whether the extension's developer's interests are aligned or at odds with yours.Here is the email I received today at 8h33:ĭear Developer, We routinely review items in the Chrome Web Store for compliance with our Program policies to ensure a safe and trusted experience for our users.uBO's logger allows you to see it's own behind-the-scene network requests (mainly to GitHub, for updating filter lists).What network requests are made by an extension behind the scene?.Under which license does the code fall?.This is just to demonstrate that the permissions alone do not tell the whole story. ![]() However, Web Protector has a home server, and it does "phone home" as opposed to uBO (which has no home server in the first place).įor every web page you visit, you can see Web Protector sending behind-the-scene network requests to : Some might be inclined that it can thus be more trusted than uBO, which requires the privacy permission. This extension requires the same permission as uBO, minus the privacy one. Web Protector - Reliable Phishing ProtectionĬhrome store: Web Protector - Reliable Phishing Protection (the extension no longer exists on the Chrome Web Store). I think it's time I give examples of how requiring fewer permissions is not a sure sign of higher trustworthiness. So uBO has absolutely no interest in data mining you. It started as a personal project, and it still is a personal project. Third, I have no intent to ever monetize uBO. ![]() Second, uBO does not have a dedicated server, it can't "phone home" with your browsing data, there is only GitHub, and GitHub is completely unrelated to uBO. All the sources and all the changes to the sources are fully accessible on GitHub. After I added the privacy permission to make uBlock Origin (uBO) reliable when it comes to blocking network requests, a lot of people questioned uBO's trustworthiness.įirst, uBO is completely developed in full public view. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |